According to a report by Coveo, support employees spend roughly 3.6 hours every day searching for information. That number is up from 2.6 + Read More
It’s live! Access exclusive 2025 live chat benchmarks & see how your team stacks up.
Get the data
It’s live! Access exclusive 2025 live chat benchmarks & see how your team stacks up.
Get the data
Most contact centers measure new agent ramp time in weeks or months. During that period, some managers manually create assessments, grade responses, and guess at when someone is ready for live interactions.
The new agent sits through product training, shadows experienced staff, and reviews knowledge articles; then still panics during their first real customer chat because none of that prepared them for the actual pressure and intensity of a situation.
The gap between training and reality costs money, and companies have been increasingly opting for AI to help bridge this gap. When Hitachi implemented an AI onboarding assistant in 2024, they cut HR staff involvement from 20 hours per hire to 12 hours, according to Bala Krishnapillai, VP and Head of IT for the Americas.
But saving time only solves part of the problem. Agents don’t learn support skills from lectures. They learn by handling the work, and traditional training rarely simulates actual customer interactions realistically.
Role-playing with a colleague doesn’t prepare anyone for an angry customer whose card was declined at checkout. Reading scripts doesn’t teach agents how to pivot when customers ask unexpected questions.
A key component that’s been missing from conventional onboarding is the depth of training that helps prepare agents to answer questions more confidently and serve your customers better. Modern AI tools aim to solve these issues in onboarding. In this piece, we’ll discuss exactly how.
While most onboarding challenges in any company or department are almost always similar, customer support departments face a few headaches that are uniquely theirs.
Companies hand new agents a mountain of material:
Then, they expect them to just brush up their knowledge and start performing like top performers right off the bat. Nuances based on industries need to be considered too.
For instance, a gaming support agent needs to understand payment processors, responsible gaming policies, bonus terms, and regulatory compliance before their first chat. A university help desk worker needs to know registration systems, financial aid policies, campus resources, and FERPA requirements.
Here’s the real problem: agents absorb all this information in a vacuum. They read about account verification procedures but have no idea how to handle a frustrated player whose withdrawal has been pending for three days. The knowledge exists somewhere in their brain, but it becomes challenging to access it under pressure.
Think about how you’re training agents right now:
None of this replicates the pressure that comes with live conversations. Your trainer plays a patient, reasonable customer during role-play. Remember that episode of The Office where Jim, Dwight, and Michael are practicing sales calls and Dwight starts making fun of Jim’s “pretend” name?
That’s what most role-playing looks like. Everyone knows it’s fake, so people often tend to act quite different than they would in real-world scenarios.
Real customers aren’t patient when it relates to money matters like deposit delays, issues with course registrations, or if their account shows unauthorized charges.
Shadowing shows agents what veterans do, not how to develop those instincts themselves. By the time new agents discover which situations make them freeze, they’re already learning on your actual customers, creating a substantial gap in simulation-based training scenarios.
Most CS department heads would know this one intimately. Training quality depends entirely on which manager has bandwidth that week. Sarah creates detailed assessments and gives thorough feedback. Mike rushes through basics because the queue is backing up.
Seasonal hiring makes it worse. University help desks need 20 student workers before fall semester. Online retailers staff up for holiday shopping. Gaming operators hire before major tournaments.
You can’t give seasonal hires the same attention you’d give two new hires in March. Six months later, agents on the same team have completely different skill levels. Some can handle complex issues independently. Others still panic over basic questions.
When is someone ready for live customer interactions? Unless you have actual, quantifiable training data, you’re probably guessing.
Passing a quiz about fraud detection doesn’t mean an agent can spot a phishing attempt in real time. Reading knowledge articles doesn’t prove they can find the right article in the heat of the moment while a customer waits. Most teams use arbitrary timelines. Two weeks of training, then you’re live. Not because two weeks is the right amount, but because you need bodies answering chats.
This creates two bad outcomes:
Both waste money and frustrate everyone involved.
Let’s talk about some math that keeps support leaders up at night. You hire a new agent and start paying full salary from day one. But that agent won’t handle tickets at full speed for weeks, maybe months.
The real cost isn’t just the slower productivity:
And that’s before you factor in the manager time spent coaching and assessing readiness.
Certain industries with increased regulations, like banking, higher education, or gaming, feel this even more:
That productivity gap keeps bleeding money. And in case that new agent quits after three months because they felt thrown into the deep end? You get to start this whole expensive process over again.
Stop wasting time on inefficient training. Learn how Comm100 AI Onboarding shortens ramp time and boosts agent performance.
Learn moreTools like Comm100 AI Onboarding enable companies to more effectively onboard support agents in a much shorter timeframe. Here are seven ways AI is transforming conventional onboarding procedures:
Live chat training is a critical part of onboarding support agents now, primarily because of how prevalent this channel is today.
Previously, live chat training used to be pretty straightforward: companies would use a series of scripted scenarios, and that was it. They wouldn’t update them at all, and responses weren’t really graded either.
Modern AI onboarding systems create chat scenarios that adapt in real time based on agent responses. An agent practicing account security questions gets different follow-ups depending on how they answer. Respond too technically and the AI customer gets frustrated and asks for simpler explanations.
Miss a verification step and the scenario evolves into a compliance issue that escalates. Use the right empathetic language and the customer calms down, making the conversation easier to resolve. The simulation adjusts constantly, branching into different paths just like actual customer conversations do.
This dynamic approach to training matters because active learners retain 93.5% of previously learned information compared to only 79% for passive learners after one month.
Reading scripts and watching videos creates passive learning. Handling unpredictable, branching conversations where decisions have consequences creates active learning. The difference in retention is massive.
For universities managing student financial aid inquiries or banks dealing with fraud investigations, AI in customer service creates training scenarios that mirror the complexity agents will actually face.
Consider a typical university scenario: A student starts by asking a straightforward question about their financial aid disbursement date. The agent provides the answer. Then the student mentions they’re considering dropping out because they can’t afford textbooks this semester. What was a simple informational query just became a retention conversation requiring empathy, knowledge of emergency aid options, and quick thinking.
AI simulations let agents practice these transitions hundreds of times before they happen with real customers. The system tracks how well agents handle the shifts, whether they miss important details during the pivot, and if they maintain appropriate tone throughout the conversation.
The simulations score performance automatically on multiple dimensions. Agents see immediately where they went wrong without waiting days for a manager to review their practice session. Did they forget to verify the account before discussing details? The system flags it.
Did they use language that could be misinterpreted? They get feedback on that too. That instant feedback loop accelerates learning in ways traditional training never could, where agents might wait a week to hear whether they passed their role-playing assessment.
Multiple choice quizzes test memorization. They tell you whether an agent can recognize the right answer when they see it. AI-powered assessments test whether agents can apply knowledge under pressure when there’s no list of options to choose from.
Instead of asking “What’s our refund policy?” with four possible answers, modern AI customer service software generates open-ended scenarios: “I bought premium access three weeks ago, used it twice, but I’d like a full refund because I’ve found a cheaper competitor. Can you please process it?“
There’s no multiple choice. The agent must construct their response from scratch, just like they would during real support conversations.
The system evaluates multiple dimensions of that response:
This comprehensive evaluation reveals whether agents truly understand the material or have just memorized answers. An agent might know the refund policy word-for-word but completely fail at explaining it to an upset customer in a way that doesn’t escalate the situation further.
The system builds these scenario-based quizzes automatically from your knowledge base. Feed it your policies, procedures, and common customer issues, and it generates realistic assessment scenarios.
That means assessments stay current when policies change. Update your refund policy in the knowledge base and the AI immediately starts testing agents on the new policy in realistic scenarios. Your agents aren’t studying outdated information from last quarter’s training deck while your actual policies have evolved.
You know that moment when a manager asks if a new agent is ready for live interactions and you have to guess based on a gut feeling? Maybe they were confident during training. Maybe they asked good questions. Maybe they just seem ready. But you’re essentially making an expensive decision based on vibes rather than data.
AI onboarding tools can help you eliminate the guesswork entirely. They track exactly which topics each agent has mastered and where they’re struggling, giving you a complete picture of readiness based on actual performance data.
For instance, you can use AI onboarding software to create dashboards that show metrics like:
The dashboard also helps you identify which training scenarios are too easy or too hard. If every agent passes a particular simulation on their first try, it’s probably not testing anything useful.
If every agent fails a specific assessment multiple times, either the scenario is unrealistically difficult, or your training materials aren’t adequately preparing them for it. Either way, you have data to make improvements rather than continuing with training that doesn’t work.
Your new agents don’t all start from the same place and treating them like they do wastes enormous amounts of time and money. Some have five years of customer service experience but don’t know your products.
Others know your industry intimately but may not be familiar with offering omnichannel support. A few may come from technical backgrounds and grasp product features quickly but struggle with the soft skills of customer interaction. Putting all of them through identical training means the experienced agents are bored while the newer ones are overwhelmed.
The adaptive approach becomes even more important as different types of AI agents become standard in customer service operations. New agents need to understand not just how to help customers themselves, but also:
Financial institutions benefit even more from this personalized approach because the knowledge requirements are so varied. A new agent with banking experience might breeze through account types, transaction processing, and general financial terminology.
They don’t need hours of training on what a checking account is. But they probably need extensive training on your specific fraud detection protocols, your particular risk assessment workflows, and the subtle differences in how your institution handles exceptions compared to where they worked before.
In most organizations, new support agents are paired up with senior agents. They can ask questions, shadow them, and run through scenarios one on one. However, this may impact the performance of your senior agents, especially if there’s excessive turnover.
AI onboarding systems ensure that agents don’t have to be constantly bogged down with questions. They’re always available, and agents can leverage them to learn how to handle a specific situation, including various simulations of different scenarios until they feel confident.
Plus, they can access training resources whenever learning actually happens for them. The 24/7 availability becomes essential for operations that span multiple time zones or run around the clock.
A gaming support team with agents in Manila, Malta, and Montreal can’t schedule group training sessions that work for everyone without someone being forced to attend training at 3 AM. Asynchronous, always-available training means everyone can learn during their optimal hours while still covering the same material.
Along with using AI copilots in customer service, companies can extend this concept of always-available support beyond training into actual work. During real customer conversations, new agents get real-time suggestions based on what customers are asking for.
Here’s what traditional training misses entirely: the psychological stress of actual customer interactions. An agent might know every policy perfectly, have great communication skills, and perform well in all assessments.
Then they face their first genuinely angry customer and completely freeze. Their mind goes blank or emotions run high. Their carefully practiced responses disappear. They panic.
Knowledge doesn’t equal performance under pressure, and traditional training rarely creates that pressure in controlled ways.
AI simulations create realistic stress deliberately, preparing agents for the emotional reality of support work:
Agents need to practice these high-stakes scenarios repeatedly until the pressure becomes manageable. The first time an agent handles an account fraud simulation, they might take fifteen minutes, forget half the security steps, and use language that makes the customer more anxious. By the 20th simulation, they can handle it smoothly in five minutes while making the customer feel heard and supported throughout the process.
Here’s what happens in most training programs. New agents finish a practice scenario knowing they messed up somewhere but are unsure where. In traditional training, they wait three days for their manager to review it.
When feedback finally arrives, it comes in a group training session where the manager discusses “common mistakes people are making” without naming names. Everyone knows who struggled, but the feedback is vague enough that nobody learns much from it.
The alternative is worse. Feedback comes during a one-on-one review where the manager pulls up recordings and points out every mistake. The agent feels defensive. They’re thinking about how embarrassed they are rather than learning. The feedback might be accurate, but the delivery ensures it won’t stick.
AI onboarding systems flip this dynamic completely by providing immediate, private feedback that agents can actually use to improve.
When an agent completes a simulation, they get detailed scoring instantly:
Most importantly, this feedback is visible only to them. No public scoreboard. No comparing their performance to other new hires. No manager reviewing their mistakes in a group setting. No bias, no human error. Just private, actionable information about what they need to work on.
For managers, this private feedback system changes their role from evaluator to coach. They can see aggregate data showing that three agents are struggling with a particular topic, suggesting a training content issue rather than individual performance problems.
But they don’t need to review every single practice session for every agent. The AI handles that tedious work and flags only the situations that genuinely need human attention.
The feedback system also helps agents self-assess their readiness for live interactions. Instead of waiting for a manager to decide they’re ready, agents can see their own progress through concrete data.
See how Comm100 AI Onboarding helps you accelerate training, reduce ramp time, and empower new agents with confidence from day one.
Learn moreSupport teams can’t afford to waste weeks or months getting agents ready for customer interactions. Every day spent in ineffective training is money lost to productivity gaps, experienced agents pulled away from their work, and managers guessing about readiness instead of knowing.
The technology isn’t replacing human coaching. It’s making it possible for managers to actually coach instead of spending their time creating assessments, grading responses, and tracking completion rates. Comm100 AI Onboarding handles the repetitive work. Managers focus on helping agents break through learning plateaus and develop the judgment that only comes from human experience.
Organizations that implement AI onboarding aren’t just saving time. They’re training more confident agents who trust their skills because they’ve practiced them extensively in realistic scenarios. That confidence shows up in every customer interaction, from day one.
Discover how AI-driven onboarding can transform your support team’s performance. Book a personalized demo today.
Request Demo
By clicking "Subscribe", you agree to our Privacy Policy.
According to a report by Coveo, support employees spend roughly 3.6 hours every day searching for information. That number is up from 2.6 + Read More
Here’s something curious about AI chatbots in 2025: the companies using them badly are getting worse results than those using no automation at + Read More
With over 1 billion monthly active users, Telegram has evolved far beyond a simple messaging app. It’s become a comprehensive communication ecosystem that’s + Read More